Buylowest.com update
April 30, 2008 — spikeheapI have just spent the morning on the phone Federal Express, who refuse to accept that delivering parcels and giving no indication that there may be duty charges levied weeks later is wrong. Apparently the call centre crew have a distorted view of the law when it comes to things like this, because the guy on the end of the phone was basically calling me an idiot, when all I was trying to get them to do was recognise the flaw in the system and fix it. Ah well, I guess that’s what you can expect of large companies - people at the bottom who just don’t care.
Buylowest have dropped off the face of the earth. No surprises there. I am now initiating a dispute with PayPal, because the terms are hidden and they claim Royal Mail as their courier. I’ve paid FedEx the £50, and I don’t expect that to be seen again. It’s such a massive flaw that I can’t claim that £50 from PayPal because it didn’t go through their system, but I can hardly blame them.
In hindsight this is a clever exploitation of a delivery company’s import policy. The customer service rep for FedEx refused to believe it, so I’ll try the head office. It would be so easy for them to stamp parcels coming for outside the EU as having potential extra charges, or to include a little leaflet. At least then the consumer wouldn’t end up caught between a rock and a hard place. I for one certainly don’t relish the idea of chasing my refund from the United States. I’m just not that good at law (and not bothered enough for £50).
This post is an update for an earlier post: BuyLowest.com




